You Mean Donald Is Somewhat Of A Racist? Who Would Have Thought?

Yep, it's happened. Donald has officially crossed the one line that made it impossible to confirm what liberals have known since day one.

When former White House staffer Ornarose Manigault Newman released her new book, the world found something out. According to her during the filming of The Apprentice, he had used a certain racial slur. While I won't say it here, just know you can find it on the front page of The Daily Stormer.

Do I believe it? Yes. Of course I do. Here are 5 reasons as to why:

1. He's Donald Trump. Need I say more? 

2. The person who gave this source was a former White House who had no reason to lie. She's actively going against her non-disclosure agreement by publishing the book. You would think she would at least use it to tell the truth.

3. Candance Owens, savior of black conservatives, couldn't defend Donald. Instead, she decided to start complaining that someone dared to give out the information.

4. Not even Sarah Huckabee Sanders could deny it.

5. He's Donald Trump. Need I say more?

10 Things We Can't Afford While We Can Afford A Space Force

1. Give healthcare to the 45,000 people who die every year due to lack of basic healthcare.

2. Pay off the $1.5 trillion of student loan debt.

3. Continue funding Meals on Wheels.  

4. Continue funding welfare programs.

5. Not cut funding towards education.

6. Deal with the over half a million homeless people in our country.

7. Deal with the almost 40,000 veterans in this country.

8. Continue giving healthcare to poor people.

9. Continue giving healthcare to kids.

10. Pay off our $21 trillion national debt.

Huge Win For The Left: What The Media Isn't Telling You

So after the past week, the media has been obsessed with Alexandra Ocasio Cortez. And by that, I mean trying to destroy her. Their latest tactic is obvious, claim no one likes her anyway.

Because if no one likes her, why even care what she has to say? She's clearly wrong, that's why no one likes her. And no one likes her because she's wrong. Wait?

CNN, CNN, I'm sorry, I just really don't like CNN. Although they aren't alone. Many news outlets talked about how progressives lost this week, despite the fact they won bigger than ever.

Meanwhile, what they didn't tell you is that 5 Justice Democrats won primaries that same night. So if progressives are losing, we're doing a really bad job at it.

More InfoWars Hypocrisy

So Infowars was banned from YouTube, Spotify, Facebook, and Apple. Personally, I say good riddance. If you're against anti-discrimination laws then I don't have an issue with you not getting to benefit from these laws.

It's just like what I said after Twitter shadowbanned conservatives. Although, funnily enough, Twitter didn't ban Jones. If you don't want bakers to be forced to serve gay people cakes, no one should be forced to put you on my social media platform.

This is where the right responds that "These platforms have a monopoly", this is untrue. Competition exists for all these platforms, big names are just too lazy to use it. Don't like YouTube? Go on Dailymotion, Vimeo, Vidilli, Veoh, and so on. Don't like Twitter? Go on Gab or All4Truth. And these are all just off the top of my head.

The fact is these companies are following the first amendment. As they are not making any laws obstructing freedom of speech. They are only enforcing the rules they, as a private company, have set up.

Plus, this idea of a "digital Bill of Rights" which people like Paul Joseph Watson are endorsing is the dumbest idea of all time. You know what happens when companies are forced to advertise on things that hurt there image? They stop advertising on the internet and go back to Television. Basically, you're putting every internet service behind a paywall.

So what's the moral here? Follow the rules of the websites you use. It isn't hard.   

How Dare A Company Hire Someone Racist . . . Against White People

Well, it looks like The New York Times is in yet another controversy because of course it is. At this point them being in a controversy is my sign the sun will rise the next day. 

Okay, so what did they actually do? Well, The New York Times hired an Asian woman by the name of Sarah Jeong. After doing some digging, many found out she tweeted many things that were racist against white people.




 The last one is clearly a satire of the "white genocide" conspiracy theories. All 3 of these are clearly a joke. Also, she was hired to write about tech, not about race.

But even then, can we talk about the hypocrisy here? Just a few weeks ago conservatives were angry . . . people were angry about racists. Remember when Papa John said something racist and people were angry about boycotts.

But then I realized the difference. John was racist against black people, Jeong was racist against white people. It's honestly funny how many "colorblind" people seem to select their outrage towards what race is being targeted.

But the right is right on one thing. You can't say what Jeong said about any other race . . . without being defended by conservatives. 

If The Dems Want Us To Vote . . .

Going into 2020, one thing is very clear. The Democrats don't seem to want to win in 2020. I know it's only 2018 and the midterms haven't happened yet, but you should still be concerned.

Donald is already campaigning. Mind you, President protectionist makes his flags in China, but still.

This should be the easiest election to win in United States history. Yet, as the first round of presidential candidates shows up, it looks more and more like they're going to give the President a second term.

To be clear: I will endorse whoever the Democrats put up in 2020. Even Zeus The Guitar Lord, a one-off Spongebob charter, would be a better president than Donald Trump. However, that doesn't mean everyone will. Tons of people will be willing to reelect a failed president because the other person is bland. 

Let's see who they have:

Sanders is still more than likely going to run. Him being a Senator and releasing a new Anti-Trump book is already proof of that. This is also helped by the fact that he's the most popular politician in America.

However, he will still be 80 during his presidential inauguration. Over a full year of the average US lifespan. Even with a 70-something-year-old president, people will still be worried rather or not it's too old. Of course, many Bernie supporters would love to take years off their own lives to give Bernie more of his own, but we aren't even close to their yet. 

Biden is someone that this blog has already talked about. So I'll make it short. He's the old ranting man of the Democratic Party. He's also one of the blandest white men in all of US politics, and that's saying something.    

However, a new man has entered the race. Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you former Attorney General Eric Holder. The man who is "interested" in a presidential run.

Eric Holder is the man I named the term "Pulling a holder" after. Basically, it means that once a government official is out of office they will advocate for better ideas than the ones they pushed for in office. Specifically, due to how now advocating for the legalization of marijuana. Meanwhile, he allowed President Obama to keep it illegal on the federal level and pave the way for Jeff Sessions. 

Or how about how he let President Obama sit by and throw the book at Edward Snowden. Now he says Snowden "did a public service". But he refused to do anything when the entire Justice Department, that he ran, said otherwise. 

So, we're 3 candidates in and so far only 1 of them is any good. Although at least I can see Biden winning, Holder just seems too much like a standard establishment type to be like in a post-Trump world where you're supposed to at least pretend you're bucking the establishment. Biden at least has been around the block long enough to call his ties "experience". Holder has never held elected office and has only been appointed to positions. 

Basically, the number of times a would-be president would have already won looks like this so far:

Sanders: 20 (many of which he was a write-in for) even if he doesn't win reelection for his Senate seat in November.

Biden: 10

Holder: 0

This can only end so well. 

Maybe The Market Does Correct Itself: The Twitter Story

So it turns out Twitter has been shadowbanning conservatives. Not actually banning by the way, but making it slightly harder to see the tweets.

Honestly, I think this is a fair trade-off. This is the same year that conservatives defended the right of a business owner to not serve gay people.

"But Ephrom, don't you think business owners should be forced to serve gay people products?" I hear you ask. To which the answer is yes, but there is a notable difference. 

I think we have all figured out, at this point, that gay people don't choose to be gay. Yet, conservatives choose what political views they have. The fact is, Twitter is simply applying their TOS, I have no issue with that. It is no different than a conservative website not allowing me to post comments that support single payer. 

So which way is it conservatives? Can a business be forced to serve people they don't like, or should they be required to accept all customers? Maybe it's just these people are homophobic, but who knows.